Five-Day Banking Is Still Pending.
Five-day working has existed in Central Government offices for decades, and LIC adopted it in 2021. Bankers are still waiting. But even if...
For bank employees in India, the demand for a five-day working week is no longer a new demand.
It has travelled through negotiations, settlements, protests, strike notices, conciliation meetings and repeated assurances.
And yet, in October 2026, the question remains unresolved.
Bank branches currently observe holidays on the second and fourth Saturdays of every month. That arrangement dates back to 2015, when the Government notified those Saturdays as public holidays for banks under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The first, third and fifth Saturdays ordinarily remain working days.
The demand now is simple: declare the remaining Saturdays holidays too.
But the story becomes more difficult to understand when banking is compared with other institutions.
The Government itself moved to a five-day week decades ago
Central Government administrative offices have been on a five-day week since 3 June 1985.
The Government order implementing the change stated that offices would work Monday to Friday and remain closed on Saturdays. Working hours on the five working days were adjusted accordingly.
That was more than four decades ago.
LIC provides an even closer comparison because it is a massive public-sector financial institution serving customers across India.
LIC officially shifted its offices to a
Other public institutions and regulators also operate with five-day administrative schedules in various contexts.
So it is reasonable for bank employees to ask:
Bankers have already been negotiating this for years
This is also not a situation where employees suddenly demanded every Saturday off without discussing how the banking system would function.
The issue has already gone through the formal collective-bargaining process.
The 9th Joint Note and 12th Bipartite Settlement were signed on 8 March 2024. Union documents state that the understanding regarding declaration of all Saturdays as holidays had been taken up through the Indian Banks' Association, with implementation requiring Government approval and the necessary clearances.
More than two years later, however, five-day banking is still not operational.
Recent developments have effectively sent the subject into another round of examination.
Following talks between the IBA and the United Forum of Bank Unions in September 2026, a high-level committee was constituted to examine implementation issues and alternatives connected with working hours. The three-day strike proposed for September 28-30 was consequently deferred.
The Government's position has been that it has not formally approved a five-day week for banks and that the proposal requires consideration of operational and stakeholder concerns.
That distinction matters.
An agreement or recommendation between IBA and unions is not the same thing as final statutory approval by the Government.
But it also explains the frustration among employees: after years of negotiation, they are still waiting at the approval-and-consultation stage.
And now we are discussing stakeholders again
There are legitimate stakeholders in banking.
Customers matter.
Businesses matter.
Bank managements matter.
The Government matters.
Employees matter too.
Questions about branch accessibility, credit delivery, government business, clearing and customer service should certainly be examined before changing the working calendar.
But there is another question worth asking.
The Government introduced a five-day week in its own administrative offices in 1985 after consultation with employee representatives. LIC has operated on a five-day schedule since 2021. Digital banking, UPI, ATMs, mobile banking and internet banking have transformed how a large proportion of routine transactions are conducted.
Banking, of course, cannot simply be compared one-for-one with an administrative department. Branches still provide essential physical services, particularly to customers who rely on cash, documentation and face-to-face assistance.
But that is an argument for designing the transition properly.
It should not automatically become an argument for keeping the issue unresolved indefinitely.
There is an even bigger problem
Suppose the Government approves five-day banking tomorrow.
Every Saturday becomes a holiday.
Would that automatically solve the work-life problem of a bank employee?
Probably not.
Because the number of officially declared working days is only one part of banking's work-culture debate.
Bank employees have repeatedly complained about late sittings, staffing shortages, business targets, frequent reviews, pressure surrounding government campaigns, calls outside office hours and being asked to report even on holidays for particular exercises.
That distinction is crucial.
A holiday written on the calendar has limited value if organisational culture continues to treat employees as permanently available.
The banking system already demonstrates how exceptional opening can work.
RBI instructions have historically permitted or required agency-bank branches dealing with government business to remain open on certain holidays when necessary. There have also been specific directions to keep designated branches open for government transactions around financial-year closing.
Exceptional requirements can therefore exist.
But an exception and a routine expectation are not the same thing.
September 2026 exposed that contradiction again
During the latest confrontation over five-day banking and other employee issues, unions announced strike action.
The Government subsequently appealed for uninterrupted banking services and said it had been engaging with employee organisations through conciliation.
Banks were also opened on the Sunday immediately preceding the proposed September 28-30 strike as authorities sought to minimise disruption to customers. Contemporary reports noted Sunday banking activity ahead of the planned industrial action.
From the customer's perspective, continuity of essential banking services is understandable.
From the employee's perspective, however, the symbolism is difficult to ignore:
Bankers seeking a five-day week can still find themselves reporting to work on a Sunday.
And that takes this debate beyond Saturday holidays.
Five-day banking and healthy banking are not the same thing
A genuine discussion about employee well-being therefore has to contain at least two separate questions.
The first is straightforward:
Should banks move to a five-day working week?
The second is harder:
What protection does an employee actually have on those two non-working days?
If targets can routinely spill into evenings…
If WhatsApp messages and calls continue after office hours…
If employees are repeatedly asked to report on holidays…
If severe staffing shortages mean that the same volume of work is simply compressed into five days…
then five-day banking could become a calendar reform without becoming a work-culture reform.
That does not make the five-day demand meaningless.
It means the reform has to be bigger than changing the colour of Saturdays on a calendar.
There is also the customer-service argument
One concern raised around five-day banking is the possible inconvenience to customers and businesses if branches remain shut for two consecutive days every week.
That deserves serious consideration.
But the debate should also recognise how banking has changed.
UPI runs around the clock.
Mobile and internet banking operate throughout the week.
ATMs and cash recyclers remain available.
NEFT is available round the clock, and many banking processes that once required a branch visit can now be completed digitally.
Physical branches nevertheless remain essential for many customers, especially senior citizens, rural users, small businesses and people dealing with documentation-intensive transactions.
The policy question therefore need not be reduced to a binary choice between employee holidays and customer service.
Alternative staffing models, stronger digital assistance, adequate recruitment, specialised service centres and carefully designed arrangements for essential functions can all be examined.
Indeed, the newly constituted committee is reportedly considering different implementation models rather than treating the matter solely as a question of shutting branches.
Perhaps the real discussion should now move beyond “five days”
Bank employees have been asking for five-day banking for years.
They have negotiated for it.
They have protested for it.
They have threatened strikes over it.
The issue has reached IBA, unions, the Finance Ministry and repeated rounds of conciliation.
The important question now is not merely when another Saturday will become a holiday.
It is what the banking industry expects the working life of a banker to look like.
Because a genuine weekend means more than a closed branch.
It means that, except for clearly defined essential requirements, employees should be able to disconnect from work.
It means staffing should be sufficient to complete ordinary work during ordinary working hours.
It means targets should not routinely convert evenings and holidays into unofficial extensions of the working week.
And it means exceptional Sunday opening should remain exceptional.
Five-day banking may therefore be an important reform.
But it cannot, by itself, cure toxic work culture.
If India eventually gives bankers two official weekly holidays but employees still remain psychologically and operationally on duty seven days a week, the industry would have changed its calendar without changing enough of its culture.
That may be the bigger conversation banking needs to have.
Join Bankpediaa WhatsApp Channel
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va4b33GDuMRj0KCA6L3u
Written by
